Jump to content

toiletduck

Lapsed Club Member
  • Posts

    678
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by toiletduck

  1. In fairness, there's a base spec Celica like there's a base spec Focus. You can get all the parts bin stuff you want to plug on and make it look like an RS if you didn't buy one initially. I can't think of many cars (that aren't halo brand marque cars) that don't have a poverty spec. When my last car got written off I was given a bottom of the bottom spec brand new Focus and it remains the worst driving experience of my life - and I used to own a Hyundai Accent with 300km, no functional brakes or exhaust on it that we didn't dare change the oil as it was very likely holding the engine together.

    Saying that, why they thought the base spec Celica owner would want to go off-roading I have no idea. Defaulting to 4x4 ride height was a weird one.

  2. I know what you mean, but I feel like having a sleek interior without any messing around with ultimately pointless things that (can) break or go wrong is a sign of a more modern car too. You don't see any audiophiles going for the ten speaker setup, for example. Personally I don't want silly bells and whistles in a two door coupe. The only things I'd add to a Gen 7 interior realistically is cruise. To me, throwing the kitchen sink into a car just means they were trying to out-do other brands with gimmicks.

    That said, JDM cars do tend to have a bad rep for interiors post millenium. I've heard a fair bit of complaining about Subaru and Nissan interiors too.

  3. If someone held up a sign saying "services?" to me on the motorway I'd assume I was being propositioned and he meant the bathroom...

    I'm gonna assume to bring the cost down and because no-one's ever really thought "I wish my car had a pop up steering wheel and lots of speakers". Gen 7 got 190bhp (er, ish) out of a 1.8 engine, and has everything that most people want? The chassis is like 16 years old now and I feel like it holds up as a strong example of an old car that doesn't feel dated.

    • Like 3
  4. Offer just started today and I picked up 8 lt 5W40 fully synth on my trade card for £22.

    Sorry to always ask you questions David, but that's interesting when people are going for the expensive stuff from Opie - do you notice a difference with that Halfords oil to stuff like Fusch/Silkolene type things?

  5. Update:

    Re-emailed Darren and he replied, yes he is very busy but probably in demand for good workmanship, or maybe he's out there with his surf-board - which is what i'd be doing this time of year in Cornwall g-yep.gif

    Darren of 'Vinyl Locking' has produced and dispatched my centre caps, and they arrived in this mornings post, and i'm really pleased with them g-thumb.gif

    Just need to work out the best way to stick them on the plastic caps - so the edges won't lift when i wash the car, all good suggestions welcome!

    Debs

    You should be able to prize off the middle of your current centre caps and leave a void to put them in - clean that with tar and glue/degreaser and give it a light sand and they should hold :)

  6. Except that's absolutely not true in any sense, as we've established in this thread... you don't claim on your insurance if you're not at fault. Insurance covers vehicles without MOT so long as the incident wasn't caused by an issue stopping the car being roadworthy. MOT and insurers have literally no relation, MOT is proof of roadworthyness and insurance is a policy with a company to cover costs of at-fault and non-fault accidents, assuming the car is roadworthy. Even if it isn't road worthy, like the lights don't cast a correct beam pattern, if you crash in daylight then why should it be considered? If your car isn't roadworthy because it's brakes don't work and you rear end someone, then yeah, insurance isn't going to pay out.

    Will leave it there as feels like this is going in circles a bit!

  7. explains why our policys are so high when the insurance company makes fraudulent claims the car should not have been on the road and they know that they cant say the accident wasnt the fault of the car having no mot as they are not testers bet they wouldnt be paying out if it were the other way round

    He's not even claiming against his insurance... if he'd hit someone without having an MOT, but it would pass (which is the important bit if you're at fault), should it have any say in an insurance policy? Insurers sell insurance, they don't enforce road law, the police and state do. If it's shown to be illegal/would have failed MOT, the insurance is void. Otherwise, it's still an insurance policy.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.