Jump to content

Bill T

Life Member
  • Posts

    5,892
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Bill T

  1. Which means that no MOT is valid at the point your car would fail and therefore the 12 month thing goes out of the window. It's two seperate issues, one is road worthiness and one is conforming to the requirements ofcthe MOT testing regime. I entirely agree that it's a nonsense, but a certificate is valid for 12 months.... end of.

  2. The problem with that argument is that it would negate the whole system, as an MOT is only valid as a true cerificate of road worthiness at the point the tester signs it off. What if you have for racing slicks 10 months in? Your offence is driving with defective tyres, not driving without valid MOT.

    The issue here is not road worthiness but whether or not you hold a valid MOT certificate. So actually only me and my accolites are correct :lol:

  3. 120mph minus 10% happens to be 108. So for 112mph it's less than 10% deviation.

    And to correct cooper, the law in Japan is to have a 112kmph speed limiter, converting the car to miles just so happens to convert that speed limiter too.

    Really? The Japanese are restricted to 70mph?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.